LEC # | ASSIGNMENTS WITH SOLUTIONS |
---|---|
1-2 | Chapter 10: 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 (PDF) |
3-4 | Chapter 10: 33-38, 43, 44 (PDF) |
5-6 | Chapter 10: 48, 51, 52, 61, 62, 78-81 (PDF) |
7-8 | Chapter 10: 82, 88, 90, 91, 92 (PDF) |
9-10 | Chapter 10: 110, 111, 116 (PDF) |
11-12 | Chapter 4: 5(a-b), 6(a-e), 8, 11, 12 (PDF) |
15-16 | Chapter 4: 46-50 (PDF) |
17-18 | Chapter 5: 1-4 (PDF) |
19-20 | Chapter 5: 22-24, 31-34 (PDF) |
21-22 | Chapter 5: 36-38, 49, 50, 54, 55 (PDF) [Please note: There are no solutions to 54, 55] |
23-24 | Chapter 5: 58, 60, 61 (PDF) |
Callahan, Hoffman, Cox, O’Shea, Pollatsek, and Senechal wrote:Our point of view We believe that calculus can be for our students what it was for Euler and the Bernoullis: A language and a tool for exploring the whole fabric of science. We also believe that much of the mathematical depth and vitality of calculus lies in these connections to the other sciences. The mathematical questions that arise are compelling in part because the answers matter to other disciplines as well.
The calculus curriculum that this book represents started with a 'clean slate;' we made no presumptive commitment to any aspect of the traditional course. In developing the curriculum, we found it helpful to spell out our starting points, our curricular goals, our functional goals, and our view of the impact of technology. Our starting points are a summary of what calculus is really about. Our curricular goals are what we aim to convey about the subject in the course. Our functional goals describe the attitudes and behaviors we hope our students will adopt in using calculus to approach scientific and mathematical questions. We emphasize that what is missing from these lists is as significant as what appears. In particular, we did not not begin by asking what parts of the traditional course to include or discard.